Step 3

Submit Your Entries

All entry materials are submitted electronically.

Begin working in the online entry area in advance of the entry deadline to see the additional questions you will be required to answer in order to submit.

You may edit or delete your entry at any time until you click submit.

Step 2

Download This Year's Entry Materials

Please download and review the Entry Materials for the 2019 Global Effie Awards below.

Step 1

Things you should know before entering the competition.

In advance of the 2019 competition entry portal being open, use entry materials and the information outlined below as a guide to Effie's rules & regulations.

Collaboration yields the most effective, thorough cases.  You are encouraged to work together with your agency and client partners to submit a case. 
Global Effie entries are judged by some of the brightest and most experienced business leaders. We draw on their experience to not only judge the work of their peers but to highlight learning for the industry overall.  Global Entries are judged in two phases: ​

Round One Judging takes place online & in-person.  Judges are asked to individually review 10-15 cases across a range of categories. Each jury member reviews cases across multiple categories. Due to the volume of entries reviewed by each judge, brevity is encouraged.  Cases that score high enough become finalists and move on to Final Round Judging.
At Final Round Judging, all Global Effie Finalists are judged during the same session.  Finalists are judged against other finalists within their category, and like Round One, all elements of each case are reviewed and scored. Final Round judges discuss each case before finalizing their scores.

In both rounds, judges evaluate the written case and creative executions. Scoring is done anonymously and confidentially. Judges provide feedback on each case for the Insight Guide.​​

Jurors are specifically matched with cases that do not prove a conflict of interest. For example, a judge with an automotive background would not review automotive cases. For this reason, it is critical that entrants provide market and category context, and limit the use of industry jargon in their entries. Give judges a clear understanding of the category situation and explain what your KPIs mean in the context of your category. ​

Scoring Criteria
Judges in Round One and Final Round are asked to evaluate a case's effectiveness using the following scoring system:

Challenge, Context & Objectives......23.3%
Insights & Strategic Idea....................23.3%
Bringing the Idea to Life.....................23.3%

The judges’ scores determine which entries will be finalists and which finalists are awarded a gold, silver, or bronze Effie trophy. The finalist level and each winning level – gold, silver, bronze – have minimum scores required in order to be eligible for finalist status or for an award. Effie trophies are awarded in each category at the discretion of the judges. 

It is possible that a category may produce one or multiple winners of any level or perhaps no winners at all – no matter the number of finalists. 

See further details on the judging process and scoring system in the Effective Entry Guide.
The following will result in disqualification and entry fees will be forfeited.

1.  Failing to adhere to the Effie Eligibility rules.
Data presented must follow rules regarding markets/regions presented and the Effie eligibility period.  Work must have run in at least one county between 9/1/17 - 10/31/18,  and in other required markets between 9/1/15 - 10/31/18.  No results after 10/31/18 may be included.   Data prior to the eligibility period may be included for context. 

2. Entry does not meet category definition requirements. Entries are judged based on effectiveness within the entered category.  

3. Agency names/logos published in the entry form or in the creative materials. Effie is an agency-blind competition; no agency names should be included in the materials that judges will review (entry form, media addendum, creative reel, creative images).  Do not include any agency names in your sources – this includes agency names other than your own. The source of data should be referenced as “Agency Research,” “PR Agency Research,” “Media Agency Research,” etc.

4. Data not sourced.  All data, claims, facts, etc. presented anywhere in the entry form must reference a specific, verifiable source. Sources must be as specific as possible in documenting all evidence, while not citing specific agency names.  Provide source of data, type of research, and the time period covered. The Entry Portal is set up to encourage sourcing via footnotes.  Refer to the "sourcing data" guide for more information.
5. Including screen grabs or other images of your creative elements in your written entry form.  
Entrants may not include any images of creative work, screengrabs of social media or other websites, or any other pictorial elements in the written entry.  Any images of creative work must be provided as part of the Creative Examples for Judging.  Charts/graphs are allowed to be included in the written case.

6. Directing Judges to External Websites. Entrants are judged solely on the materials presented in their written entry and creative examples (creative reel + images).  Entrants are not permitted to direct judges to websites for further information or for further examples of work.

7. Missing Translation.  All entries with non-English creative materials must include a translation page at the end of your entry form or via subtitles within the creative materials.
8. Violating Creative Example (Reel, Images) Rules. 
Entrants must follow all creative reel rules as outlined in the entry kit. This includes, but is not limited to: labeling each example by the market/region in which it ran; competitor logos/creative work and results may not be included in the creative examples; time limits must be followed.  See full rules, including guidelines on editing and content, in the Creative Requirements section of the entry kit.  
Be direct and concise. Present your story in an easy-to-follow style with minimum hyperbole. The link between the strategic challenge, the objectives, big idea, the creative executions, and results should be clear.

Be compelling. Your entry should be stimulating to read. Share your story with passion and personality – with facts to back it up.

Include clear, simple, relevant charts and tables. If done correctly, charts and tables allow judges to easily assess the success of the marketing initiative.

Proofread.  Ask a strong writer to review your case for spelling, grammar, logic flow, and mathematical errors.

Know the rules. Review the formatting requirements, entry requirements, and the Reasons for Disqualification before submitting your entry.  Refer to the Sourcing Data Guide.

Provide context. Identify the competitive landscape.  Context is key.  Do not assume that the judges reviewing your entry are aware of the marketplace ins and outs of your particular category. Be sure to provide a clear picture of the marketplace situation, category and competitive context.  Judges frequently down score entries that fail to give this context as it is not possible to evaluate the significance of the objectives set or results achieved without it.

Tell judges why it was successful. For every objective provide clear, sourced results and provide context for judges to judge those results and objectives. Restate your objectives and KPIs in the results section.  For example, what was spend for your brand in the prior year, for the competition, etc.? What were results prior year vs. now for your brand and the competitive landscape, etc.?  Explain the significance of your results – what did they mean to the brand?

Eliminate other factors that could have led to the success of the brand.  Prove that it was the marketing communications effort that led to the results presented in the case.

Review further tips on submitting an effective entry in the Effective Entry Guide.
We respect that entries may have information deemed confidential.  Within the online entry area, entrants are asked whether or not publishing permission is granted for the written entry.  

Indexing Data in Your Entry
Companies across the full spectrum – from large to small and across all industry sectors enter the Effie Awards.  The Effie Award’s confidentiality policy, the ability to index data, the ability to set publication permissions, etc. are all established to ensure that any company can enter their effective work without hesitation. 

While judging is confidential and entrants may select publication permission for their written case, Effie understands some entrants may still have concerns regarding sensitive information.  When presenting numerical data within the entry, entrants may choose to provide those numbers as percentages or indexes, so that actual numbers are withheld.  Additionally, unless the entrant opts to allow Effie to publish the entry as it was submitted if it becomes a finalist or winner, only judges will see the written entry as it was submitted.  
This year’s eligibility time period is September 1, 2015 – October 31, 2018 and the awards will be presented in May 2019. For some companies, this delay may alleviate some concerns regarding sensitive data.


We recommend nominating your client and agency team members for judging. Participating as a judge is one of the most valuable ways to learn about the award, understand how judging works, and experience our security and confidentiality rules firsthand. To nominate a judge, please complete our Judge Application Form

Effie Board, Executive Staff, and Committee members are senior, well-respected professionals in the industry on both the client and agency side. If you are interested, we would be happy to set up a time for them to talk to you about confidentiality during judging; how to involve key team members in the judging process; and how you can submit indexed data. If you would like to have a further discussion about confidentiality, please  

See full details on confidentiality of your case in the Confidentiality & Publication Policies.
Effie Worldwide is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that stands for effectiveness in marketing communications, spotlighting marketing ideas that work and encouraging thoughtful dialogue about the drivers of marketing effectiveness.  

In order to help fulfill this mission and provide learning to the industry, Effie relies on entrants’ willingness to share their finalist and winning case studies with the industry.  

By providing permission to publish your written case, you are:

Bettering the industry.
By allowing other marketers to learn from your success, you are inspiring the industry to raise the bar and make their marketing better.  

Bettering the future leaders of our industry.
Colleges and universities use Effie case studies in their courses, and Collegiate Effie participants learn how to write their own effective submissions by learning from yours.

Showcasing your team’s success in achieving one of the top marketing honors of the year.
Effie wins help attract new talent, prove the importance of marketing in business, and strengthen agency-client relationships.  

Publication of Your Written Entry

The Effie Awards offers finalists and winners the opportunity to have written cases published in the Effie Case Database, in turn helping inspire the industry and do their part to "Make Marketing Better".  Entrants who give permission to publish their written case may have their entry featured on the Effie Worldwide website or Effie partner websites or publications.

In the spirit of learning that Effie represents, we encourage you to share your case studies so that we may "Make Marketing Better".

We respect that entries may have information deemed confidential.  Within the online entry area, entrants are asked whether or not publishing permission is granted for the written entry.  Entrants may select from the following options:

- Publish the case as it was submitted
- Publish an edited version of your case
- Publish the case as it was submitted after three years
- Publish an edited version of the written case after three years

The written case is the only portion of the entry that should contain confidential information, and therefore, the only portion of the entry that is included in the above publication permission policy.  The creative work (reel, images), public case summary, and statement of effectiveness should not include confidential information and will be showcased in various ways if your entry becomes a finalist or winner.

To learn more about publication permissions, please review the Confidentiality & Publication Policies guide.
Review the 2019 entry kit for a thorough outline of all requirements from this year's competition.
PDF 2019_Global_Entry_Kit
2019 Multi-Market Entry Form Template & Guide

The Multi-Market Track celebrates efforts that ran in at least five countries within the past three years. 

NOTE: This Entry Form template is to be used for all categories except Positive Change: Environmental categories for Multi-Market Track.
DOCX 2019_Global_Effie_Entry_Form_Multi-Market
2019 Multi-Region Entry Form Template & Guide

The Multi Region Track celebrates efforts that ran in at least four or more countries and in two or more worldwide regions within the past three years.  

NOTE: This Entry Form template is to be used for all categories except Positive Change: Environmental categories for Multi-Region Track.
DOCX 2019_Global_Effie_Entry_Form_Multi-Region
Entry Form used for all Positive Change: Environmental category submissions in the Multi-Market track.  

NOTE: Positive Change: Social Good efforts for the Multi-Market track should use the standard Global Effie Entry Form for Multi-Market.  
DOCX 2019_Global_Effie_Entry_Form_Multi-Market_PosChange_Environmental
Entry Form used for all Positive Change: Environmental category submissions in the Multi-Region Track.  

NOTE: Positive Change: Social Good efforts for the Multi-Region Track should use the standard Global Effie Entry Form for Multi-Region.  
DOCX 2019_Global_Effie_Entry_Form_Multi-Region_PosChange_Environmental
Review advice from past Effie judges.

This document will provide:
- Brief outline on judging process
- General judge tips on crafting an effective entry
- Specific judge tips for each of the scoring sections
PDF 2019_Global_Effective_Entry_Guide
Reviewing winning cases is a great way to see what it takes to earn a Global Effie Award. Two sample cases are provided.

Additional cases may be reviewed in the Case Study Database.
PDF 2019_Global_Case_Study_Samples

The Entry Portal for the 2019 Global Effie Awards is now open.  Please start your entries via the Entry Portal link below.

The 2019 Global Entry Portal is now open
For entry questions, contact us at

Interested in becoming a Global Effie judge? Apply here.